By Andrew Mack
In his piece last month about “incremental infrastructureâ€, Ethan Zuckerman makes a number of excellent points about the recent development of infrastructure in Africa. Using his example of the entrepreneur who put up cell towers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, he rightly observes that there are opportunities to think beyond the traditional, top-down structures of infrastructural development.
He cites the logistical and budgetary problems of many nations as they seek to build out not just the famous “last mileâ€, but in cases like DRC, many of the basic earlier miles that need to be in place if a country wants to be connected – by road, by power grid, or by wireless. And, while he doesn’t dwell on one of the real reasons for this failure – Government disorganization or outright corruption – he hints at it as a driving force which creates both the space and the need for other approaches.
However, while the idea of incremental infrastructure is interesting, I would argue that at least to some extent, Ethan’s argument misses the larger point. It is not incremental infrastructure so much as “entrepreneurial infrastructure†that Africa needs and has shown it wants.
By focusing on the example of cell towers in DRC, Ethan may have chosen the one item best suited for incremental infrastructure. But consider roads… if a community – or a firm – decides to build an incremental piece of road, and who pays? Who maintains the road? Who sets the safety standards (as road accidents are an epidemic in many African countries today)? And what if the road doesn’t connect in to a larger grid? Clearly, while cellphones may not need coordination to function, most other pieces of infrastructure – roads, energy, etc. – do. And they need standards.
Moreover, there are issues of economy of scale and policy. Consider the case of neighboring Uganda. In Uganda, cellphone licenses were bid out, encouraging competition, and cellphone use has grown from some 5,000 lines in 1998 to more than 2.6 MILLION today. The major carriers have invested – and made – millions, and I would argue, have done more for Uganda’s development than most of the major donors over the last decade. A licensing regime that favored incremental providers might have brought service to a few villages, but today, CelTel is the largest taxpayer in the country, serving the entire nation and recently, offering no-roaming service across the sub-region – in Kenya, Tanzania, and recently also in DRC. An incremental approach would not have been able to provide this service, pure and simple.
What we need to do is re-orient our thinking, I believe. Rather than focusing on the challenges – and there are many – we need to step out of our past frame and see the markets as what they are: big and underserved. What we need is not so much small (incremental) infrastructure as infrastructure that is constructed by people with an entrepreneurial mindset. If the Government of Kenya is prepared to invest in wiring classrooms and has both the scale and technical savvy to pull it off, that’s great. If the private sector can do it better, then the Government should act as facilitator. In some instances, a public-private approach will be the best.
Without question, Ethan makes a good point about the effectiveness of many large projects in Africa, especially famous dam projects and the like. Still, this is not unique either to Africa, or to energy. Corruption and a lack of oversight will ruin a project, whether it’s managed by a poor African Government or Halliburton. Especially in infrastructure, the key is getting value for money. Everybody – Governments, the private sector, and consumers themselves – all need to think entrepreneurially.
In the end, while small may be beautiful in many things, I wouldn’t want my own water system in Washington, DC any more than my friends in Lamu would want their own. What they want is a water system that works. Based on my observations from more than 20 years work on the continent, I would argue that a focus on the incremental could – while providing solutions in some areas – actually hurt efforts to build a more complete and more robust African infrastructure with the policies and investments to make it sustainable.
While there will always be underserved areas where other options might not be possible, incremental infrastructure would be a poor substitute for the kind of top shelf, state of the art infrastructure Africans are looking for, the kind of infrastructure that could help them compete in the global economy.
Andrew Mack is the Founder and Principal of AMGlobal Consulting, and a former World Bank official. He can be reached at: contact@amglobal.com
]]>Very well said. I agree with you that it is all about allowing the continent to take ownership of both it’s successes and failures. And I might add that something which is beginning to happen is Africa telling her story from her perspective to take the PR back.
On to what you said about making a living and doing something good in the process-Amen! And again this is already happening. I don’t want to rant so I’ll keep it to one example.
Lagray Chemicals is a company owned by a husband and wife team. The wife is from Nigeria and the husband is from Ghana. The company is based in Ghana and makes drugs to combat malaria and Aids, but here’s the kicker-they are for profit and they are making a big difference by helping so many to regain health.
Dr. Graham talked about something related in a comment on beninmwangi a while back
Hash, it is hard to say, you’ve had a lot of top 10 type posts lately-but I’m inclined to agree with Clay that this is your best post yet!
]]>I think it’s more of a way of life – an attitudinal change – so to speak. Yes, it encompasses all the three areas you listed and much more!
]]>Imnakoya, how do you propagate that “can do” mindset? I know a lot of Africans who are trying to make a go of it. I think it’s like what John Wesonga said, instead of people being innovators and creators they tend to copy. He was talking about the digital world, but I’ve seen it happen in other industries as well.
So, is it innovation, education or entrepreneurialism – or all 3?
]]>Well, back to the discussion…technology will pay a major role in reversing the negative trend seen in Africa, however – and just as you stated – it’s not a silver bullet, and shouldn’t be seen as one.
The problems in Africa stem not from lack of technology but lack of the right mindset. With the right mindset, common problems become solvable, bottom-up, by the people, while those in positions of power and authority will look out for the common good.
Having the right mindset is all about having a “can-do” mentality, like the Malawian kid William who went out to build himself and family a windmill! If this attitude can be milled and dispensed to a couple of thousands Africans…ha-hah!!!
]]>check out http://www.orijin-ent.com
contact me, will love to do something with you